Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monika Princess of Hanover

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 16:37, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Monika, Princess of Hanover[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about a person who is only notable for having been married to the pretender to a throne that has not existed since 1866. The article has been tagged as needing citations for three years. I don't think this meets WP:BASIC and should be deleted.Smeat75 (talk) ~~21:04, 21 November 2013 (UTC)~~ 13:06, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 February 21. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 13:11, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no plausible claim to independant notability.TheLongTone (talk) 15:38, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 16:13, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wives of claimaints to non-extant titles are not default notable, and nothing else she did makes her notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:41, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence of sufficient notability (being the stepmother of the living proof that monarchies are an inherently bad idea isn't enough, nor is owning an art collection). —Kusma (t·c) 20:10, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:15, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.